I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… GOOD LUCK.....https://Www.Worksclick.Com

It is difficult to understand why people cannot see these failed predictions and continue ti accept new predictions.

In the UK we are experiencing the storm surge predicted by the much maligned Piers Corbin (using Fourier transform methods) six months ago. I now await the usual clown show attributing it all to 'catastrophic climate change'.

Ad hoc literally means "for this" in Latin, and in English this almost always means "for this specific purpose". Issues that come up in the course of a project often require immediate, ad hoc solutions. An ad hoc investigating committee is authorized to look into a matter of limited scope. I am convinced beyond a shadow of doubt there are a number of Ad hoc think tanks that get paid by governments to spin the narrative in a direction favoring a climate crisis.

Climatologists predictions have been so inaccurate that typically it is no better than chance or worse. By logical consideration and by scientific methods, therefore, it is nonsense. But there are incentives to continue the charade that persist, even if it is outright fraud. The key is to present one absolutely necessary manifestation of warming that must occur, say the absolute persistent loss of Arctic sea ice, and constantly note that if there is no overt, uncontested, permanent loss of sea ice, then no other weather phenomenon can be due to warming. That is, if the most sensitive, earliest and indisputable effects are to happen in the Arctic, then if there are no indisputable effects in the Arctic, then there is no evidence of anthrogenic warming.

What a pack of retards. Thanks.