NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




Melissa Lev

19

7

Does the Nuremberg Code (Really) Matter? by Peggy Hall

  - 16:32

Does the Nuremberg Code (Really) Matter? by Peggy Hall Original video sources here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q8iya9sjEAFO/ https://brandnewtube.com/watch/does-the-nuremberg-code-really-matter-peggy-hall_GJYyyyJNFxaZHqs.html The Healthy American Peggy Hall's website: https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/ The Healthy American Peggy Hall's channels: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwC7VpIHS2uJzJ0q5I11oQA https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-YG3bxsn0Ba0lTEmSNhEtA/videos https://www.bitchute.com/channel/bWZSESyGIP2E/ https://brandnewtube.com/@TheHealthyAmericanPeggyHall Please visit my other channels: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/P2BZo83dsHwd/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSOBDo6BvbrAKEQDizHOjjA https://brandnewtube.com/@MelissaLev https://ugetube.com/@Melissa%20Lev https://www.brighteon.com/channels/melissalev https://bittube.tv/profile/MelissaLev https://worldtruthvideos.org/@MelissaLev https://ourtube.co.uk/@MelissaLev


1

0

0

0

0

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


406 Views

Uploaded 3 years ago  

May 7th 2021  

File Size: 36 MB

Category: How To & Education







8 Comments

ITHEPREACHER

- 2 years ago  

NUREMBERG 2.0 - CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COURT CASE Grand Jury - The Court of Public Opinion - Day 1 - Opening Statements | Grand-Jury.Net https://www.bitchute.com/video/4WY2WnzQ0SPv/ - 1 1/2 hours Grand Jury - The Court of Public Opinion - Day 2 - Historical Background | Grand-Jury.Net - 6 hours https://www.bitchute.com/video/WAwRxzisAQlS/ Grand Jury The Court of Public Opinion: Day 3 PCR Test 13th Feb 2022 *** !!! https://www.bitchute.com/video/3501GmtTteeX/ - 5 hours Grand Jury - The Court of Public Opinion - Day 4 - Injections & Psych. Warfare | Grand-Jury.Net https://www.bitchute.com/video/Mg0PSJ0tG8hy/?list=notifications&randomize=false - 6 hours Grand Jury - The Court of Public Opinion - Day 5 - Economic & Financial Destruction | Grand-Jury.Net https://www.bitchute.com/video/bv99jfNXS3qq/ - 4 1/2 hours Grand Jury - The Court of Public Opinion - Day 6 - Eugenics & Outlook | Grand-Jury.Net https://www.bitchute.com/video/yBpIGydpxnb8/ This was a Dilettante Presumption Theorem: All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions or views or any other entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying endorsement of interpretations and factual statements.

walter

- 2 years ago  

Citizens are obligated through their Countries international treaty obligations. If your country has signed on to the WHO then it applies to the countries citizenship through agreement to be bound by the State you reside in.. Nuremberg trials were created by the signatories to the compact. Only the signatories have standing to bring a case to the international court. Citizens of any country have no standing for recourse because they are not the signatory. The State is. So if the people want to see Nuremberg 2.0 take place then the people will have to convince their State to bring a claim forward. Good luck on that when the State is behind this plot.

1_dr_liberty

- 3 years ago  

All these "protection" laws means almost nothing to mankind, when we know the med. tech. companies has no liability if you get harmed og die from the "miraculous" mixtures. The politicians, governments, med. tech. And insane Gates doesn't care about this kind of legislation. They overrule this legislation as if it never existed. You can't bring them to any courthouse and prosecute these inhumane individuals, caused by their selfconstructed immunity laws.

Orangputih

- 3 years ago  

The logic of your argument is flawed. The Nuremberg Code is a document formulated by the occupying powers at the end of WW2 in order to define the principles under which any person conducting crimes against humanity can be prosecuted. And prosecute they did. An INTERNATIONAL COURT prosecuted Germans and others for their crimes in an international court, and executed some of them, with the consent and therefore the acceptance, of the jurisdiction of the Nuremberg Code as applying to any and all people regardless of their citizenship or location at the time of the crime. The Code is international in nature and design and applies in all jurisdictions regardless of whether any government accepts it or not. The German and Japanese governments did not recognise the authority of the Code, but their citizens were tried under its auspices and executed by its authority. It follows then, that regardless of any assumed citizenship be it of a State, Nation or Federation, every person is accountable for their crimes against humanity in an international forum like the World Court in the Hague or the international tribunal which prosecuted NAZIs and Japanese criminals in the 30's and 40's.

Orangputih

- 3 years ago  

The logic of your argument is flawed. The Nuremberg Code is a document formulated by the occupying powers at the end of WW2 in order to define the principles under which any person conducting crimes against humanity can be prosecuted. And prosecute they did. An INTERNATIONAL COURT prosecuted Germans and others for their crimes in an international court, and executed some of them, with the consent and therefore the acceptance, of the jurisdiction of the Nuremberg Code as applying to any and all people regardless of their citizenship or location at the time of the crime. The Code is international in nature and design and applies in all jurisdictions regardless of whether any government accepts it or not. The German and Japanese governments did not recognise the authority of the Code, but their citizens were tried under its auspices and executed by its authority.

Mrbluesky

- 3 years ago  

With the world run by the same type of people the Nuremburg trials where held for in the first place and it appearing that they are winning. Don't hold your breath on anything changing. The victor writes the history.

Jeff

- 3 years ago  

I agree 100% against a one world government, amen. As for medical, I will not allow any legislative action concerning of what will affect my health. Government will not tell my wife there's too many children and the government has decided you have to have an abortion. or, you have to have a vaccine, or, you have to donate a kidney to your next door neighbor, or, your son has too many gender features and we've decided he must undergo sexual reassignment.

SweetMitzi

- 3 years ago  

Are you suggesting SCOTUS tackle a “worldwide’ case of Crimes Against Humanity? Their track record is?