Sourced of - Uncensored_Doctors - https://www.bitchute.com/video/aDVPtTTgE2O2/ As the Data Noose from the UK Tightens - its time to look at how, WHO and why successfull preventative ad early Early Treatments for Covid19 were scuttled Listen carefully from 4:55 Dr Andrew Hill states "UNITAID has a say in the Conclusions" Re: The data noose - see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ne7NhEaHudVx/ -------------- “Andrew Hill, MD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use. Hill had previously authored an analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective. On Jan. 6 of 2020, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.” "Four days before publication, Hill’s sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill’s employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill’s study." https://www.worldtribune.com/researcher-andrew-hills-conflict-a-40-million-gates-foundation-grant-vs-a-half-million-human-lives/