NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




Tony HellerPLUS

1719

268

Fact Checkers

  - 8:38

Internet fact checkers tend to be some of most untrustworthy people on the Internet. Their job is to turn truth into lies, and lies into truth.


0

3

0

0

88

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


17,262 Views

Uploaded 4 years ago  

December 2nd 2020  

File Size: 86 MB

Category: Politics







136 Comments

Elvisboy777

- 3 years ago  

PLEASE SHARE THIS VIDEO

Gary_R

- 4 years ago  

Hi Mr. Heller. I started watching your videos a few years ago when I still had some questions In my mind of who to believe about global warming. I have since made a sound decision that global warming is real. For now. Just not man made. I'm old enough to remember black smoke from power plants, oil smoke coming from under vehicles because they had crank case draft tubes instead of PCV systems and brown haze engulfing the cities. The majority of the air and water pollution that we where creating was being reduced drastically. I am A mechanic or now days a technician. (i do the same now as when I was A mechanic just with more technology) I have also had flying lessons and both of which I have to trust my gauges. I never understood why temperatures had to be adjusted if their sensors where correct. If your just looking for a trend and everything remains the same then that should be accurate. I said I don't understand but i actually do and frankly I'm tired of of the smart people trying to con me through fear tactics of global warming and now Chinese Flue.

Pghsheep

- 4 years ago  

Fantastic

Mark's Modern Life

- 4 years ago  

I for one am enjoying the Newtube experience. Keep hitting them out of the park, Tony.

architect138

- 4 years ago  

https://youtu.be/_6Kkkh4pRmI

tommy461

- 4 years ago  

screw the "fact checkers". they need to check themselves.

anti-antinomist

- 4 years ago  

snopes.com too. As many other sites. If you want watch the videos from here: https://plandemicseries.com/

RixRetro

- 4 years ago  

There is not ONE "factchecker" on the Net that I'd believe about ANYTHING.....and certainly not if the "factchecker" belonged to farcebook or twitsrthem. The sites like Snobes are just as bad because they're soooooo left wing biased it makes me want to puke. Keep up the great work, Tony.

Billrehm

- 4 years ago  

Missed you Tony. Glad l found you.

Coops

- 4 years ago  

Senator Roberts is an absolute legend and our country needs someone like him in our government.

parkey107

- 4 years ago  

big thanks from the uk for the truth and also i read roberts in australia another truth sayer

Bobinge

- 4 years ago  

Fat chequers. Their credibility bounces with similar Alarming regularity.

Truth hurts

- 4 years ago  

Great video. You got me to sign up on this site and post a few videos of truth that YouTube won't allow. Let's see if this site is actually better.

richardcoeur

- 4 years ago  

Tony: You really need to post on more than one platform. There are programs that do that automatically. You do need to be a BitChute, which is the fastest-growing platform out there. Not saying you shouldn't support New Tube. They may become the next YouTube, but your views there are 1/10th of what they were on YouTube and 1/4 of what they'd be on BitChute. Also, you should contact Stephen Crowder's lawyer and sue YouTube to get the strikes rescinded. That's how it works, sadly. If you don't have the money, start a crowdfunding. I am sure you'll get more money than you need to sue YouTube.

donaldduck

- 4 years ago  

I wondered what happened. Cancelling is like a cancer sweeping the world. One of the facts that I would like to check is how many data sets of each countries temperature records are there before the 1960's (before satellite records). I'm making a big assumption here but I assume only one agency in each country keeps a complete record of all that countries regions temperature records going back to the 1800's (e.g. Australia - BoM; UK - Met Office; USA - NOAA etc.) If that is the case then logically if there is only one historical global data set of temperature records then of course scientist analysing that data would come to the same conclusions as each other (if they are using established scientific methods). Claims therefore made by people such as Dr Brian Cox that: "What, they've all manipulated it in the same way and accidentally got to the same answer? Is that what you're saying?" as proof of the integrity of scientist and therefor the data record is nonsense. Scientist may be operating independently of each other but they are unknowingly (or knowingly perhaps) using the same data, manipulated before it gets to them, and therefore getting the same invalid results and making erroneous predictions and modelling from those results. In Australia, an interesting article by Alan Longhurst, examined the data set of the Rutherglen agricultural research station which BoM could not help itself from dubiously adjusting (the maximum in 1939 disappeared). This man has an impeccable reputation and career achievements in science that few will ever obtain. I pray that he will not be cancelled.

JimBob99

- 4 years ago  

I've been missing my near daily fix of real climate news on YT. NewTube is now in my favorites. I hope this takes off.

John_R

- 4 years ago  

I like how the "fact checkers" don't contact the people they fact check against nor provide their names or contact information.

Fred

- 4 years ago  

I remember a time when facts overruled theory. If the theory did not arrive at the same numbers as the measured ones, the theory was wrong and needed more work. Now we see the facts are overruled by a theory and model. I see a bleak future for science (or a return to the dark ages).

GreyGeek

- 4 years ago  

The current methodology used by Global Warming extremists has been used before. It was called Lysenkoism. "Science" in the service of politics.

propagandasceptic

- 4 years ago  

the comment 'verdict' is taken directly from scepticalscience website, owned by the wannabe statistician john cook that got fame for his 97% consensus propaganda. here you can see cook & fellow statistical amateurs reason to reach their pre meditated 97% finding http://www.hi-izuru.org/forum/The%20Consensus%20Project/2012-02-27-Official%20TCP%20Guidelines%20%28all%20discussion%20of%20grey%20areas,%20disputed%20papers,%20clarifications%20goes%20here%29.html https://imgur.com/a/hoJAYm6 i just so happen to read not just the abstract, but the entire article, not a single word about co2 or man made was ever made in that abstract that cook none the less took as proof that it supported his propaganda, adding to the 97%

EdithAnn

- 4 years ago  

Get em TOTO

Munge

- 4 years ago  

Get them tony

It's impressive how fact-checkers always manage to debunk actual facts... (:

RKave

- 4 years ago  

F$$cking fact checkers!!!

Wings77

- 4 years ago  

My phone keeps shutting down when I watch this video. It’s happened twice.

jlinz

- 4 years ago  

Facebook, Twitter and YouTube perform an invaluable service when their “independent fact checkers” flag posts, tweets and videos. I now prioritize and make certain to read and view the flagged content.

Wings77

- 4 years ago  

I followed you from FB, I have a different name on here. Keep it up. I always share your stuff.

Johnny67

- 4 years ago  

hacks

InmatesRunningAsylum

- 4 years ago  

Candace Owens just started to sue these fact checkers and they're backing off. Has she found a crack in Big Tech's censorship armor?

marxistslayer

- 4 years ago  

tony and freinds: fyi, i am not a youtube channel creator or on any other platform, but i sometines comment on vids. I just got permanently banned by/on youtube becausethey really disliked my point of view, opinions, comments. There was no warning, no 'strikes ', just termination. I was banned from twitter many mmons ago. Point being they are agressively banning not just content creators but also users too. This is to supress and silence us. And its certain to impact content creators subscribers numbers and rating value of respective content. I suspect this is the next stage of thier marxist censorship strategy. If you are merely a user like me and also been banned, let the rest of us know. When channels are banned its obvious, everyone knows, not so when users are banned. Stops from subscribing , commenting, liking, etc.

Wings77

- 4 years ago  

I followed you from FB, I have a different name on here. Keep it up. I always share your stuff.

Jumemowery

- 4 years ago  

What's easier to switch....temperatures or votes????

kblomme

- 4 years ago  

Great video. PLease keep putting a link in YouTube to these so we all know that you have another video ready. Thanks for all that you do

Spanner

- 4 years ago  

Two thousand years ago the Romans were growing grapes in the north of England as far north as Cumbria it was known as the Roman warm period Google it no jets or vehicles

Gabriel_Oak

- 4 years ago  

I've defected from YT & subscribed to your channel.

GreyGeek

- 4 years ago  

I did more than that. I deleted my gmail address, my google account, and YT in the process. Then I installed a hosts file which sends all the social websites to the infinite bit bucket in the sky. On my android phone I removed Google app store and installed froid.

GRAMIL

- 4 years ago  

I think that most reasonable people realise that fact checkers can lie just as any other poster. They should be made to explain exactly why they made the decision they did. meanwhile Tony how can I get a movement started in the UK? I am not going to idly sit by and let these lying excuses for scientists get away with fraud. How do I find UK people with a like mind?

digger337

- 4 years ago  

Allister Williams has a huge follow of sensible people. He's like minded from what I've seen. UK guy, I believe Surrey area.

Peter Clark

- 4 years ago  

Numbers are up on this channel. Good news.

Fredrik Östman

- 4 years ago  

Hi Tony, you have a nasty 60 Hz noise there. Need to check you cables.

Kssooner

- 4 years ago  

God bless you Tony. Please keep exposing them. We will follow.

ozzyosgood

- 4 years ago  

Good thing this site is here now. With the strangulating practices of the big three social media, WE NEED ALTERNATIVES.

Dtkehn

- 4 years ago  

What else are they grooming us for I wonder? Unfortunately I have some ideas.

Being

- 4 years ago  

Good work Tony, keep it up.

Vlad

- 4 years ago  

You are clearly a doubleplus ungood thought criminal. Keep up the good work.

Klyde Sixkiller

- 4 years ago  

Time to make NewTube part of our daily routine. ( scientia potentia est )

Zeke

- 4 years ago  

The world’s reliance on historical US temperature data for many varied governmental policies makes their altering of this data all that much more horrendous and unscrupulous. These aren’t scientists, they’re third rate politicians dressing up in their academic degrees and trying to twist the world to their ideology for their financial interference and their own self aggrandizement. Any true scientist would be horrified if they found that the data they relied on for their conclusions had been artificially altered.

Oldgringo

- 4 years ago  

I keep thinking of the millions of men and women that gave their lives to keep America free only to have that freedom stolen from the Marxist left. They pissed on all their graves.

GreyGeek

- 4 years ago  

They did more than that. They torn down grave stones and monuments as well. It leaves NO doubt what they think of our republic, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

SYFYRYTR

- 4 years ago  

Fighting propaganda, that has done its work, with numbers is a tough row to hoe. Some of us can count. Most can not, nor do they want to. Darn those numbers.

Bedebill

- 4 years ago  

If I had lots of money I'd sue them on your behalf Tony. Thanks for your vids you keep the world honest in Re to the climate fraud , Boris Johnnosdn in the UK has gone Green mad , we voted for a Conservative and got Greta Thun - bloody -Berg.

europa

- 4 years ago  

Tony needs to present this info to Congress. If Congress refuses they should censored for fraud.

G_JACKSON

- 4 years ago  

* This claim about climate change is disputed. Click here to see why facts are racist.

Tim_H

- 4 years ago  

Good to see you again, Tony. Have you looked at the allegations of election fraud by Dominion?

freedom_of_speech

- 4 years ago  

I should think that a public forum like YouTube shouldn't have the power to decide whether or not someone has their facts right- sufficient to ban them unless their calling for the overthrow of the government. Some lawyers should evaluate this situation. Maybe Tony has some of his ideas wrong- so what? We can't have a nationally approved "party line" on subjects like climate change.

ePostings

- 4 years ago  

Thank you for this mirror channel! 😎

Vfreak

- 4 years ago  

In the UK, the press are now saying 2020 was one of the 3 hottest summers on record. I can tell you, it was nowhere near the summer of 1976 ! The tarmac in my street didn’t even melt !

Numapepi

- 4 years ago  

I have noticed most "Fact checkers" fact check something you didn't say. "During the day the sky is blue in the absence of clouds..." A "Fact Checker" would say that is pants on fire false. Then go on to prove clouds are white... so the statement is obviously false.

Eriks

- 4 years ago  

Great video

CaptainCope

- 4 years ago  

Keep up the good work Tony

Manic

- 4 years ago  

Ahh, yes, "Fact checkers" aka the Ministry of Truth.

Spanner

- 4 years ago  

Two thousand years ago the Romans were growing grapes in the north of England as far north as Cumbria it was known as the Roman warm period Google it no jets or vehicles

Doc214

- 4 years ago  

I don’t see where they”erased” the trend. The first chart shows 1999 cooler than 1934. So does the second chart. It hasn’t been changed. What is different is that they show the temperature getting hotter AFTER 1999 to where it is hotter than 1934. What am I missing?

Manic

- 4 years ago  

They did change it, look at the dates of the charts, again.

KEB

- 4 years ago  

Why does this remind me about the US election? The same “logic” the same form of lies, but maybe the same politicians are behind it. Facts don’t mean anything to them, and the corruption goes on and on.

TauCeti

- 4 years ago  

Tony, have you considered Parler? It's not quite the same format, but is still a platform for you that doesn't use such draconian measures as FB and Youtube.

Druadhlus

- 4 years ago  

Just use Youtube to advertise.

DJMason

- 4 years ago  

Thank you for all you do in this new world of errant statistical propaganda. Really it’s quite sad when we consider that “someone”; considers us too ignorant to read a thermometer, barometer, measure precipitation, or record our findings. Plus, I’ve noticed the “real feel” temperatures displayed in greater prominence over actual temperatures... “teach your children well”!

zz51f9

- 4 years ago  

@Tony Heller - so when confronted with the evidence of tampering, what is the reason given for the "adjustment" of the temperature? I try to bring this up with my Climate Crisis friends and they say "Tony Heller is not a climatologist and is spreading lies!" I have no way to prove what is fact and what is not fact.

Miatacrosser

- 4 years ago  

Tony is a Geologist. If your Climate Chicken Little friends don't understand that a Geologist IS a Climate Scientist. Then they are the ignorant ones.

the_Thurman123

- 4 years ago  

They will probably ban you anyway. They don't like what you are saying or the link you are providing. I'll have to write in down as it seems to disappear from my saved sites.

RaphaelM

- 4 years ago  

Yeah post a link on your videos from YouTube a brief introduction will give a thumbs up you can get paid, and then we'll watch it here on newTube, until we learn how to navigate NewTube at least.

offgridnut

- 4 years ago  

It is important for all of us who appreciate Tony and his work to like, comment and share the limited videos on YouTube to help drive people here.

Ibex

- 4 years ago  

Absolutely right.👍

THE DGS

- 4 years ago  

👍👍

Wildchemist

- 4 years ago  

Since you can't post the truth on YouTube then why would you care about maintaining your account? May as well join the ranks of the truthtellers who have been banned. At this point it's a badge of honor.

GeraldFrost

- 4 years ago  

because even though EweTube doesn't like the truth (as Tony sees it) there are still truth seers on that site. To reach them is the reason for leaving the old site up. I suspect that after ninety days Tony will push the limits a bit harder.

tmcom

- 4 years ago  

Anyone can become a leftie, just ignore facts that go against what you are told from sites that regularly spout lies about the climate, (Times Mag, NASA, etc) spout a sermon about any facts being the work of the devil, (Rubert Murdock) and close down discussions since the science is settled. Being dropped on your head at birth, and leading a dull, non eventful life, is a plus, as is atheism.

JohnDLoud

- 4 years ago  

Thank you!!!

existxtinct

- 4 years ago  

Look it up, Candace Owens is suing the "fact checkers"

serfsup

- 4 years ago  

Goebbels is alive and well like the wind up sand filled dude in Hell Boy

gwc1954

- 4 years ago  

Anytime I hear "factchecker" or "The science says" I know what comes next is a lie. I am one of the few that still believe my own eyes and I know for a "fact" that the world economic forum has an insidious plan for a "Great reset" and that fact you can check for yourself with a simple google search...for now anyway!

TonyHeller666

- 4 years ago  

I think you should post this to YouTube!!... Actually!. I dare you!!! 😝

Staffan144

- 4 years ago  

ZZzzz

the_Thurman123

- 4 years ago  

Tony has posted the same information and has been banned. Are you brain dead, 666? By the way, I can attest that the information from NCAR and the GHNC that Tony presents is accurate. I can go further that NOAA constantly changes the data. How many times do you need to change the data from the 1880? Removing outliers once is one thing, revising the data that is inconvenient is another.

TauCeti

- 4 years ago  

You are an alarmist shill. thanks for your comment brainwashed though you are.

TonyHeller666

- 4 years ago  

Is that all you are capable of doing!??. Getting old hey!!?... Sweet dreams! 😘

TonyHeller666

- 4 years ago  

As for you other two!!... Definitely been brainwashed effected!!! 🤗

Raincoast

- 4 years ago  

Fact checkers from the Ministry of Truth.

KEB

- 4 years ago  

Spot on!

DOBRODAVE

- 4 years ago  

If Twitter and Facebook were around in 1775 : Paul Revere : "The British are coming, The British are coming !" FC! Learn how British taxes are beneficial to society .

Absolutist

- 4 years ago  

Happy to follow you here from YouTube. Just post a link on YT to here. I love your work Tony.

Untapped

- 4 years ago  

I am so sorry that YouTube sucks. This really pisses me off.

Mr P

- 4 years ago  

What power do we have when these 'fact checkers ' can discredit someone so universally? Very worrying .

DOBRODAVE

- 4 years ago  

If Twitter and Facebook were around in 1775 : Paul Revere : "The British are coming, The British are coming !" FC! Learn how British taxes are beneficial to society .

God_hates_liberals

- 4 years ago  

Tony, I don't know if you read the comments section on your vids, but on the off chance that you do, please keep making your short vids on YouTube and leaving links to this site in the descriptions. Thanks, and keep fighting the good fight. 👊

alternator

- 4 years ago  

“In January 2005, NOAA began recording temperatures at its newly built U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN). USCRN includes 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states. NOAA selected locations that were far away from urban and land-development impacts that might artificially taint temperature readings.” “The USCRN has eliminated the need to rely on, and adjust the data from, outdated temperature stations. Strikingly, as shown in the graph below, USCRN temperature stations show no warming since 2005 when the network went online. If anything, U.S. temperatures are now slightly cooler than they were 14 years ago” https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2019/08/23/climate_alarmists_foiled_no_us_warming_since_2005_110470.html “The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) was established to give the most accurate temperature readings compared to the old Cooperative Observer Network (COOP) which suffers from urban encroachment, siting problems, and a multitude of human induced inhomgeneities such as station moves, incomplete data, closed stations, and runway condition stations at airports that were never designed to report climate data”

the_Thurman123

- 4 years ago  

Every year I download the data from NOAA, the temperature for the world in monthly amounts and co2 amounts by month. Each and every year they adjust all the data going back for temperature to 1880 and co2 going back to 1959. The co2 record does go back further. Silly me thought that the information would always be there so I didn't print it out. Why would a government agency cover up information or change it? I print out everything now. Some web sites have disappeared, such a 380.org. The doomsday predictions when co2 levels hit 380 ppm/v and all the 'science' that went with it.

DJMason

- 4 years ago  

Great clarity, likewise, I have 2 sheltered Thermometers, a barometer, and 2 rain gauges. I have rarely seen any appreciable offset from posted weather data.

Popa Mono

- 4 years ago  

Thanks for continuing to put out content tony. Youtube lost themselves some views is all.

bigmomma

- 4 years ago  

The fact checkers are just gaslighters Tony. Don't trust your lyin' eyes. I see Snopes doing it ALL THE TIME!

Norm Bernard

- 4 years ago  

Thanks for the contribution Tony. I know you've chosen NewTube as your primary video posting source. But, could you also duplicate your account over at BitChute please?

wastral

- 4 years ago  

Unfortunately Tony is pulling a fast one on everyone in this graph. He uses ALL stations as if they ALL equally cover the same area. To make this accurate you have to adjust for distance between stations for an equal covering. Lets look at a Graph Tony has published before: ONLY Missouri data which shows roughly equadistant stations showing cooling etc and those videos are 100% accurate, but to equate prominence to a station 15miles apart to another that is ~45 miles apart, so there are 3X more stations in certain parts of the country is just bogus. Tony knows this and this is where the rubber meets the road as trying to "spread" a station over long distances, changes in geography, is where the bogus BS happens. For instance there was not enough warming and since the Arctic has few stations, they have changed the "Homogenization" distance from 1000km to 2000km... Miraculously, the Arctic had a "warm year", when this was done as now land data has "homogeneously" applied to mostly OCEAN, or Glaciers an extra 1000km north... This was back in ??? 2016 I believe or was it 2015. Same time period they eradicated all the prior 2005 data for the USCRN data sites. Many of whom had been up for +~1 decade prior so they could start the data set in 2004? instead of the early 90's. PS: All data sets show the same thing; decreasing daily high temperatures around the world but increasing daily lows... Hrmmm, maybe because most data sites are either in, or very close to cities who all have AC and heating now along with lots of pavement. Gee, I wonder why the daily lows are increasing.... duh, heat island effects.

freedom_of_speech

- 4 years ago  

"Unfortunately Tony is pulling a fast one on everyone in this graph. He uses ALL stations as if they ALL equally cover the same area." Not really. Tony discusses this problem in some of his YouTube videos. Somewhere, can't recall, I saw Tony's resume- and I bet it's vastly beyond yours. He's highly educated and trained as an engineer who has done cutting edge computer chip development and he's been studying the climate for decades. What is your qualifications to deconstruct Tony?

Eric Frei

- 4 years ago  

Good work Tony.

Modelmark

- 4 years ago  

I live in the Netherlands and they also altered local data here. The excuse they used is that they moved from the Stevenson hut to a Pagoda hut or something. They homoginised the data in 2016 after which several older heat waves disappeared. https://klimaatgek.nl/wordpress/2018/07/27/het-raadsel-van-de-verdwenen-hittegolven/

ElectricEquinox

- 4 years ago  

This is a piss poor site but at least it doesn't censor, i'm sure they'll make it better in the long run.

Ibex

- 4 years ago  

It's definitely not the easiest but as you say, at least the truth can be expressed somewhere.

GordonVigurs

- 4 years ago  

Qisnam custodiat ipso custode?

Brendan Ward

- 4 years ago  

A Factcheck is a badge of honour.

DreamSpaceMarvin

- 4 years ago  

Probably leads more sceptics to Tony, thanks to the Streisand effect.

MarkBarrett

- 4 years ago  

One of the problems with new tube is not being able to stop and rewind 10, 20, 30, or 40 seconds to catch what I want to hear again or take a screenshot of for further reference. Other than that Tony, love your videos. I quote them all the time in my debates with these climate change fanatics .

wastral

- 4 years ago  

Unfortunately Tony is pulling a fast one on everyone in this graph. He uses ALL stations as if they ALL equally cover the same area. To make this accurate you have to adjust for distance between stations for an equal covering. Tony has published ONLY Missouri data which shows cooling etc and those videos are 100% accurate, but to equate prominance to a station 15miles apart to another that is ~45 miles apart, so there are 3X more stations in certain parts of the country is just bogus. Tony knows this and this is where the rubber meets the road as trying to "spread" a station over long distances, changes in geography, is where the bogus BS happens. For instance there was not enough warming and since the Arctic has few stations, they have changed the "Homogenization" distance from 1000km to 2000km... Miraculously, the Arctic had a "warm year", when this was done as now land data has "homogeneously" applied to mostly OCEAN, or Glaciers... This was back in ??? 2016 I believe or was it 2015. Same time period they erradicated all the prior 2005 data for the USCRN data sites. Many of whom had been up for ~1 decade prior so they could start the data set in 2004? instead of the early 90's. PS: All data sets show the same thing; decreasing daily high temperatures around the world but increasing daily lows... Hrmmm, maybe because most data sites are in or very close to cities who all have AC and heating now along with lots of pavement. Gee, I wonder why the daily lows are increasing.... duh, heat island effects.

Magus

- 4 years ago  

My first comment on newtube...

Robert__C111

- 4 years ago  

Most ''FACT CHECKERS'' are whores who will check facts to conform to the required result wanted by their paymasters.

trevorgrindz

- 4 years ago  

"Necessary adjustments" Yeah, necessary to keep the fear machine fueled, so they keep getting paid to push their fear porn onto the public!

AmericanGrl

- 4 years ago  

OF COURSE it's been cooling. I've been on the planet for a long time and it's obvious. The other thing is that humans occupy about 9% of the 28% of landmass on earth. The rest is water. The earth is 72% water.. that's all anyone really has to know. But OK, I'll provide one more fact. The Sahara desert used to be right up next to Brazil. It was tropical and had the largest lake on earth, Lake Chad. The lake was teeming with life and in fact, the ancient, left over biological material is so abundant that it blows on the wind and fertilizes the Amazon. Just those two things are enough to make me realize just how completely insignificant us humans are. I dig it.

trevorgrindz

- 4 years ago  

I dig you!

SimonJester753

- 4 years ago  

Nothing plays when I hit the play button on this video or any other video in this platform. This is the worst video platform I have encountered. Switch to Rumble .

Vanished

- 4 years ago  

Works fine for me

trevorgrindz

- 4 years ago  

If you are using a script blocker, you might have to adjust the permissions on this website in order for the video to play, as it is working perfectly for me.

Paco

- 4 years ago  

I think it's time for a new computer. The video works fine.

SeanWorkman

- 4 years ago  

Well at least they don't censor content. I admit it seems a bit clunky but the world was built on compromise.

TonyR

- 4 years ago  

I'm using Privacy Badger, U-Block Origin, NoScript and Disconnect and none of them are turned off or excepted for this site and it still works perfectly.

Fredyatelmstreet13

- 4 years ago  

A refreshing breath of truth -up to now on " they screw you over YT"-i simply forward your new platform data via open playlist on YT and enjoy reality here . Thanks for all your work to keep the bastards honest

Liamrobert

- 4 years ago  

I’m glad newtube exists but it’s very clunky to use on an iPhone. It’s weird and seems unnecessary to have to hold your finger on the screen for a few seconds in order to select play/pause etc.

Jerel267

- 4 years ago  

Today's 'fact-checkers' are the equivalent of Orwell's Ministry of Truth, just as the social media tech giants are taking on the role of 'Big Brother'. Suddenly, the dystopian future we have feared for decades has become our present, but instead of getting a strong big brother, we have a doddering great grandpa with a broken foot, a Rasputin look-alike and the worlds richest nerd to lead us into our dystopia!

DJMason

- 4 years ago  

Ha! A great observation! But when the leftist Democrats have flushed our once great nation down the toilet...and we’re left to share a potato for our daily sustenance... these truths will only serve to haunt us...

OverBored

- 4 years ago  

Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. -_Elvis Presley_

Fivebooks

- 4 years ago  

If they falsified past data then they will falsify the data going forward also. I don’t think we can trust any new data coming out. They will just manipulate it to fit their agenda.

1_dr_liberty

- 4 years ago  

"truth into lies, and lies into truth." Absolutely! Many puppets is following orders, to eliminate the truth and destroy our normal life. Very sad times indeed.

PaulGetson

- 4 years ago  

Hi Tony. Got your message on YT. First I've heard of this site. I'll have a look around. Thanks.

LotsToLearn

- 4 years ago  

So how do we get to other videos on this channel on this platform? Perhaps I should confine myself to the website?

SupporterOfRealTruth

- 4 years ago  

Just click/tap Tony's picture upper right. You'll find all his videos there.

SupporterOfRealTruth

- 4 years ago  

Sorry, upper left.. lol

Tom Noyb

- 4 years ago  

Most frustrated with low viewership have resorted to making backup YouTube channels? Presumably, YouTube will simply wipe them all out at once, when they decide to silence dissenters and "reset" the world? Don't know which strategy's best, just hoping they don't wipe-out this platform when they "reset?" You're doing God's work Mr. Heller.