NewTube

NewTube

Sign In

-30  

-15  

-5  

-1  

+1  

+5  

+15  

+30  




Tony HellerPLUS

1710

266

Do Not Pass Go - Go Directly To Gulag

  - 12:37

Climate alarmists originally targeted capitalism via CO2 emissions, but now they have cut the middleman (CO2) out of the equation .. and are directly targeting capitalism.


1

0

0

0

9

Share on TwitterShare on Twitter


2,355 Views

Uploaded a year ago  

January 31st 2021  

File Size: 136 MB

Category: Politics







40 Comments

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

The brain washing of the 97%er's continues!!! 🤗

Hoschi6519

- a year ago  

look Plants NEED CO2 otherwise they will die off, and when the plants go, we as Humans are right behind them, WHY ? because those Plants produce our OXYGEN that WE NEED to stay alive. some Scientists say that with a CO2 lever below 380 ppm, Plants will start to die off, and we are well on the way to that !

MrRumpelstilzchen100

- a year ago  

Yeah, but for several years now, WIKIPEDIA (and consorts) is pretty cryptic about this fundamental metabolism - very telling!

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Fuck man!! You sound like you really know what the fuck you are talking about hey!! 😝. Just like Tony yeh!!! 😝... 380!!? 🤔. 280!?? 🤔... Who are the some scientists!??

MrRumpelstilzchen100

- a year ago  

What do we expect, if year per year an ever increasing number graduates from universities without prospect of finding a place in natural, unforced work relations in the realm of private businesses (crony capitalism like forced vaccinations put aside). Will these people opt for a free society and a free economy or rather for an economy under the auspices of an authoritarian regime like in the PRC? You decide …!

Eriks

- a year ago  

The little ice age was when the Cathedral building stopped, coincidental with the plague.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Yeh very coincidental!! 😝... 🙄

Eriks

- a year ago  

They call it climatic optimum for a reason.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Sorry what was that reason!!?

Eriks

- a year ago  

Isn't it obvious from the name? Maybe because life thrives in warmth, and suffers in cold.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Really!!! 😝... So how long has this optimum been going for, or went for!??

Eriks

- a year ago  

Which one? The holocene one 4k years. In one of the recent vids Tony broke down how they erased the 1911 heat, the medieval warm period "climate optimum" (that one is 300 years I think) and now they're going after holocene.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

All of them!! 🤔... If you want to go on Tony's reference graph from Wikipedia that he loves to use!!!... Obviously people don't look too hard do they!!?... Do you!??

Eriks

- a year ago  

well I listed a few of them, are you really asking me to list the lengths of all of them, going back millions of years? I don't think wikipedia is a good source either, post a graph you think is valid.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

No, the ones you have listed are just fine, for now! As these are the period that Tony has been talking about yes?? Well mostly lately!!. & This is the subject that we are talking about at the moment, yeh!!?. He's only bringing into the equation a longer period back, as that is what scientist have recently now just discovered what could be truly going on!!!. We are getting pretty smart with our technology & technics man!!. & That's with everything!!! Not just the climate!... So what's so wrong with the Wikipedia's graph!?? The one Tony uses for his arguments, & like all the time!!? & One that has been generated & combined from multiple sources!!!. 🤔... It's not just a Wikipedia graph man!! 🙄

Eriks

- a year ago  

mate... first you want all of them, now you want some of them. And why did you want the lengths? Any point you have there? As far as the periods Tony's been talked about, that's exactly what I was saying, they rewrite the heat further and further back. Regarding the wiki graph, first you say it's a graph from wikipedia, then you say wiki's not the source and it's just that wiki uses it too? Please just show a graph you think is good, finally.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

You want points!!?. Ok!. You obviously playing dumb!!!. Or can't read & comprehend!!?... 🤔

Eriks

- a year ago  

It's not that I want them, it appeared as if you were trying to make one. What I want is you post a graph that you think is good or you like. Also let's be honest, it's not me playing dumb - it's you.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Why!!?. Aren't we going by the graphs Tony uses!??. What, you don't think they are a true representation now!!?

Eriks

- a year ago  

Why? Because what you're doing is the definition of playing dumb. "Aren't we going by the graphs Tony uses?" Sure, we know they're wrong, that's his whole point. If you think he shouldn't even critique them, maybe you have a better alternative, post a graph you think is good! "What, you don't think they are a true representation now!!?" Mate idk how you came to that conclusion. The only confusion is first you say it's just a graph from wikipedia, then you say It's not just a Wikipedia graph man!! If you have a better alternative graph, post it!

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Do try to put words into my mouth!!... If you know they wrong then why do you believe in his bullshit!!?. 🤔... He uses the Wikipedia graph & other similar graphs to prove his point of how hot it was back in those times!!. You know that! & Have even pointed out those times yourself!!!... The optimal period hey.

Eriks

- a year ago  

Alright about time to wrap it up. I didn't put words into your mouth, I quoted you directly.

NotTonyHeller666

- a year ago  

Yeh I'm sure you did!!

Eriks

- a year ago  

The little ice age was when the Cathedral building stopped, coincidental with the plague.

Smoking_Dog

- a year ago  

For the record, I am a "small 'l' libertarian". I support the total, absolute, 100%, free market. The small 'l' libertarian is also called anarcho-capitalism. So, this video is of interest to me. And, no, I am not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination, but I have an interest in economics, although my field (PhD) is Mathematics.

Smoking_Dog

- a year ago  

I know (hope) we all know what I am about to say, but I get so angry at the stupid sheep who believe that CO2 is "evil". Plants "eat" CO2 and sunlight. CO2 contributes at MOST 5% of the "evil greenhouse gasses" whereas WATER VAPOR is the most predominant "evil greenhouse gas" approximately 94%. So, should we ban water vapor? Hell, if the planet were a living thing, the planet wouldn't even know that we are here! We would only be a minor itch on the little toe of the left foot. People who are under the delusion that we can affect the climate of the planet and the sun have a sever case of delusions of grandeur. In the scheme of things, we are NOTHING, we can affect NOTHING. The entire universe is ALWAYS trying to kill us. Yeah... I get crazy at this nonsense, which is why these "climate alarmists" don't talk to me anymore.....

Glenn Howden

- a year ago  

Commies can want all they want but what they are going to get is a world run by Trusts. Back in the gilded age the Trusts treated the working class like serfs. Theodore Roosevelt busted the Trusts and saved Capitalism.

Bandit6

- a year ago  

Let me get this straight. They (who ever you give us their names, we know some of them) want to decrees CO2 until plants will not grow. That means FOOD! It is a means to kill the people of the earth, and this means YOU. Meanwhile they will be eating Rib-eye steak and lobster but YOU will get Soilent Green. They will get a hot shower when ever they want to, but YOU will never get a hot shower. When are all of you going to wake up and stop the madness? Tony keeps laying out the bullshit for the people, yet it seems that only a few really understand what the politicians are doing. I mean, didn't some 50 million just voted for a corrupt pedophile for President? No there was not 80 million votes for that piece of shit and you know it. We will not even go into the bullshit of changing the global temperature records which Tony points out using the very government data that they change or cherry pick. Just listen to 4:00 to 11:05! Not that one should not listen to the whole video, it is just Tony points out the bullshit in the argument that troll's like notTOBY666 want to spew. By the way TOBY666, you get your NWO vaccine shot yet?

Deplorable Neanderthal

- a year ago  

LOL! Tell us what you really think! Heheheh. IPCC are criminals of the highest order, like the real tyrant who just stole an election. IPCC, Cuomo, Whitmer, Newsom et al are criminals of the highest order. Yeah, some of us are rapidly approaching a breaking point; frankly, I don't know how Tony Heller maintains even a semblance of sanity in all this. You should look at Project Veritas' latest release(s) and listen to the likes of FB's CEO programming his troops; we know this goes on with the CCP-owned Lamestream Media as well.

CatastrophicNE

- a year ago  

Regardless of whether or not co2 drives climate change, I think everybody can agree that fossil fuels are not a renewable resource, at least at human society level time scales. And that their extraction, refining, and use all produce varying levels of toxic pollution, and I don't mean co2. The massive profits made by their exploitation are what have led to all the cool technology we have become accustomed to since the industrial revolution, and our current "standard of living". That doesn't mean that all of it was necessary or was the best possible path of advancement since that advancement was largely based on profits from using the most fossil fuels possible. If unregulated markets and the profit motive were to solely guide future technology development, there would be no incentive to not burn up those non-renewable resources as quickly as possible for the sake of higher profits, and to hell with a contingency plan for when they start getting scarce. That's why my 1984 VW gets better fuel economy than over 95% of the new cars on the road in the USA today. There is a big difference between highly regulating a finite resource to make it last longer, and trying to "end capitalism". It's the implementation of that regulation that we should be worried about, because of course it will hurt all the normal people the most and governments and their fascist cohorts and their profits won't be impacted much at all.

lobuxracer

- a year ago  

You underestimate the power of human ingenuity. We've encountered shortages of what were once commonly available resources throughout history. You're saying we're too stupid to do this again?

Deplorable Neanderthal

- a year ago  

Well said. As you say, our technological innovation is capable of dealing with things like air and water POLLUTION (we have exported our manufacturing and wastes to China since the mid-80's). BUT... although it's feasible it's expensive at first to clean up that pollution... so the frugal and profit-centered Chinese economize their pollution controls and haven't dealt with it very well. Now the "normal people" there are forced to forever wear masks and are dying young anyway.

CatastrophicNE

- a year ago  

The profit motive and greed can indeed make people stupid. We have the ability to innovate our way out of shortages, and we have the knowledge to anticipate those shortages long before they happen. Leaving it solely up to a "free market" those new innovations won't come about until it's too late, and shortages always hurt those who aren't at the top of the economic pyramid the most. The Chinese system has the ability to change much quicker and easier than the American one. They've been the fastest growing economy in the world for the past two decades. They've built whole cities in anticipation of population growth, while Boston's roads are literally falling apart, and our interstate bridges are mostly all past their expiration date and we don't have the money to replace them. If we were a little more frugal and profit centered as a country as a whole, we would stop spending so much on war, insurance, inflated healthcare/real estate/college tuitions, and we could put people to work on replacing our broken infrastructure and doing things the citizens of our country actually want.

usmcgunny68

- a year ago  

Thanks for all you do for us.

Glenn Howden

- a year ago  

Thumbs Up

Mikeyh0

- a year ago  

They tax my exhaled breath - CO2 - and my farts - methane. I cannot wait to see what they tax next.

CatastrophicNE

- a year ago  

I believe farts are Hydrogen Sulfide. I'm not sure what the tax code is on that.

Mikeyh0

- a year ago  

CatastrophicNE: Well, they do tax cow farts in Britain and CA. I thought it was the methane.

ClimateCraze

- a year ago  

This should be taught in our public schools.

ePostings

- a year ago  

Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum could have written that global warming alarmism. Perhaps he did? 😡